4.8 Article

Evidence of Band-Edge Hole Levels Inversion in Spherical CuInS2 Quantum Dots

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 6353-6359

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02707

关键词

Nonlinear absorption; multiphoton absorption; Stokes shift; Auger recombination; biexciton; trions

资金

  1. FAPESP [2013/16911-2]
  2. Office of Naval Research (ONR) through the Naval Research Laboratory Basic Research Program
  3. CNPq
  4. SAE/UNICAMP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CuInS2 (CIS) quantum dots (QDs) have emerged as one of the most promising candidates for application in a number of new technologies, mostly due to their metal-free composition and their unique optical properties. Among those, the large Stokes shift and the long-lived excited state are the most striking ones. Although these properties are important, the physical mechanism that originates them is still under debate. Here, we use two-photon absorption spectroscopy and ultrafast dynamics studies to investigate the physical origin of those phenomena. From the two-photon absorption spectroscopy, we observe yet another unique property of CIS QDs, a two-photon absorption transition below the one-photon absorption band edge, which has never been observed before for any other semiconductor nanostructure. This originates from the inversion of the IS and 1P hole level order at the top of the valence band and results in a blue-shift of the experimentally measured one photon absorption edge by nearly 100 to 200 meV. However, this shift is not large enough to account for the Stokes shift observed, 200-500 meV. Consequently, despite the existence of the below band gap optical transition, photoluminescence in CIS QDs must originate from trap sites. These conclusions are reinforced by the multiexciton dynamics studies. From those, we demonstrate that biexciton Auger recombination behaves similarly to negative trion dynamics on these nanomaterials, which suggests that the trap state is an electron donating site.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据