4.8 Article

A 3.5 V Lithium-Iodine Hybrid Redox Battery with Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Current Collector

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 1085-1092

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl404784d

关键词

Carbon nanotube; current collector; iodine; aqueous cathode; redox batteries

资金

  1. RIKEN
  2. short-term program of RIKEN International Program Associate (IPA)
  3. Cockrell School of Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-00285]
  5. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [IBS-R014-D1-2014-A00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013K1A3A1A32035430] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A lithium-iodine (Li-I-2) cell using the triiodide/iodide (I-3(-)/I-) rcdox couple in an aqueous cathode has superior gravimetric and volumetric energy densities (similar to 330 W h kg(-1) and similar to 650 W h L-1, respectively, from saturated I-2 in an aqueous cathode) to the reported aqueous Li-ion batteries and aqueous cathode-type batteries, which provides an opportunity to construct cost-effective and high-performance energy storage. To apply this I-3(-)/I- aqueous cathode for a portable and compact 3.5 V battery, unlike for grid-scale storage as general target of redox flow batteries, we use a three-dimensional and millimeter thick carbon nanotube current collector for the I-3(-)/I- redox reaction, which can shorten the diffusion length of the redox couple and provide rapid electron transport. These endeavors allow the Li-I-2 battery to enlarge its specific capacity, cycling retention, and maintain a stable potential, thereby demonstrating a promising candidate for an environmentally benign and reusable portable battery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据