4.8 Article

Room-Temperature Epitaxial Electrodeposition of Single-Crystalline Germanium Nanowires at the Wafer Scale from an Aqueous Solution

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 847-852

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl404228z

关键词

Germanium nanowires; electrodeposition; epitaxy; ec-LLS; gallium

资金

  1. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [51339-DNI5]
  2. Camille Dreyfus Teacher Scholar Award
  3. Electrochemical Society
  4. National Science Foundation through the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center at the University of Michigan [DMR-1120923]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct epitaxial growth of single-crystalline germanium (Ge) nanowires at room temperature has been performed through an electrodeposition process on conductive wafers immersed in an aqueous bath. The crystal growth is based on an electrochemical liquid-liquid-solid (ec-LLS) process involving the electroreduction of dissolved GeO2(aq) in water at isolated liquid gallium (Ga) nanodroplet electrodes resting on single-crystalline Ge or Si supports. Ge nanowires were electrodeposited on the wafer scale (>10 cm(2)) using only common glassware and a digital potentiostat. High-resolution electron micrographs and electron diffraction patterns collected from cross sections of individual substrate-nanowire contacts in addition to scanning electron micrographs of the orientation of nanowires across entire films on substrates with different crystalline orientations, supported the notion of epitaxial nanowire growth. Energy dispersive spectroscopic elemental mapping of single nanowires indicated the Ga(l) nanodroplet remains affixed to the tip of the growing nanowire throughout the nanowire electrodeposition process. Current voltage responses measured across many individual nanowires yielded reproducible resistance values. The presented data cumulatively show epitaxial growth of covalent group IV nanowires is possible from the reduction of a dissolved oxide under purely benchtop conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据