4.8 Article

Extended Solid Solutions and Coherent Transformations in Nanoscale Olivine Cathodes

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 1484-1491

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl404679t

关键词

Lithium manganese iron phosphate; Li-ion batteries; in operando; X-ray diffraction; phase transformation; rate capability

资金

  1. DOE [DE-SC0002626]
  2. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. Northeastern Center for Chemical Energy Storage, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. DOE, BES [DE-SC0001294]
  4. Carlsberg Foundation
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0002626] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  6. Villum Fonden [00007377] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoparticle LiFePO4, the basis for an entire class of high power Li-ion batteries, has recently been shown to exist in binary lithiated/delithiated states at intermediate states of charge. The Mn-bearing version, LiMnyFe1-yPO4, exhibits even higher rate capability as a lithium battery cathode than LiFePO4 of comparable particle size. To gain insight into the cause(s) of this desirable performance, the electrochemically driven phase transformation during battery charge and discharge of nanoscale LiMn0.4Fe0.6PO4 of three different average particle sizes, 52, 106, and 152 nm, is investigated by operando synchrotron radiation powder X-ray diffraction. In stark contrast to the binary lithiation states of pure LiFePO4 revealed in recent investigations, the formations of metastable solid solutions covering a remarkable wide compositional range, including while in two-phase coexistence, are observed. Detailed analysis correlates this behavior with small elastic misfits between phases compared to either pure LiFePO4 or LiMnPO4. On the basis of time- and state-of-charge dependence of the olivine structure parameters, we propose a coherent transformation mechanism. These findings illustrate a second, completely different phase transformation mode for pure well-ordered nanoscale olivines compared to the well-studied case of LiFePO4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据