4.8 Article

Atomic-Scale Observation of Multiconformational Binding and Energy Level Alignment of Ruthenium-Based Photosensitizers on TiO2 Anatase

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 563-569

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl403717d

关键词

Chromophore-semiconductor interface; energy level alignment; dye-sensitized solar cells; scanning tunnelling microscopy and spectroscopy; density functional theory

资金

  1. European Research Council (EU FP7/ERC) [239578]
  2. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J009857/1]
  3. Leverhulme Trust [RL-2012-001]
  4. Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship of the 7th FP (AdaptNano) [251930]
  5. CEITEC [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068]
  6. EPSRC [EP/J009857/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J009857/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dye-sensitized solar cells constitute a promising approach to sustainable and low-cost solar energy conversion. Their overall efficiency crucially depends on the effective coupling of the photosensitizers to the photoelectrode and the details of the dye's energy levels at the interface. Despite great efforts, the specific binding of prototypical ruthenium-based dyes to TiO2, their potential supramolecular interaction, and the interrelation between adsorption geometry and electron injection efficiency lack experimental evidence. Here we demonstrate multiconformational adsorption and energy level alignment of single N3 dyes on TiO2 anatase (101) revealed by scanning tunnelling microscopy and spectroscopy. The distinctly bound molecules show significant variations of their excited State levels associated with different driving forces for photoelectron injection. These findings emphasize the critical role of the interfacial coupling and suggest that further designs of dye-sensitized solar cells should target a higher selectivity in the dye-substrate binding conformations in order to ensure efficient electron injection from all photosensitizers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据