4.8 Article

Shape-Dependent Plasmonic Response and Directed Self-Assembly in a New Semiconductor Building Block, Indium-Doped Cadmium Oxide (ICO)

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 2857-2863

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl4012003

关键词

Plasmonics; shape effects; transparent conducting oxide; nanocrystal superlattices; metamaterials; indium-doped cadmium oxide

资金

  1. National Science Foundation through the Nano/Bio Interface Center at the University of Pennsylvania [DMR08-32802]
  2. Office of Naval Research (ONR) Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) on Optical Metamaterials [N00014-10-1-0942]
  3. Roy and Diana Vagelos Scholars Program in the Molecular Life Sciences
  4. Richard Perry University Professorship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of particle shape on plasmonic response and local electric field strength is well-documented in metallic nanoparticles. Morphologies such as rods, plates, and octahedra are readily synthesized and exhibit drastically different extinction spectra than spherical particles. Despite this fact, the influence of composition and shape on the optical properties of plasmonic semiconductor nanocrystals, in which free electrons result from heavy doping, has not been well-studied. Here, we report the first observation of plasmonic resonance in indium-doped cadmium oxide (ICO) nanocrystals, which exhibit the highest quality factors reported for semiconductor nanocrystals. Furthermore, we are able to independently control the shape and free electron concentration in ICO nanocrystals, allowing for the influence of shape on the optical response of a plasmonic semiconductor to be conclusively demonstrated. The highly uniform particles may be self-assembled into ordered single component and binary nanocrystal superlattices, and in thin films, exhibit negative permittivity in the near infrared (NIR) region, validating their use as a new class of tunable low-loss plasmonic building blocks for 3-D optical metamaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据