4.8 Article

Covalent Bond Glued Sulfur Nanosheet-Based Cathode Integration for Long-Cycle-Life Li-S Batteries

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 6244-6250

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl403715h

关键词

Covalent bond; Li-S batteries; S nanosheets; polydopamine

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB933000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21273270]
  3. Key Development Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJZD-EW-M01-3]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20130007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-capacity electrochemical active material-based electrodes for lithium ion batteries (LIBs), such as sulfur (S), always face the collapse of the electrode due to the big volume change during insertion of the lithium (Li) ion and therefore shorten the cycle life of the cells. Herein, a series of design from the viewpoint of both individual components and the I entire cathode in lithium-sulfur (Li-S) cell was introduced aiming at addressing the issues of poor conductivity, leakage of intermediate polysulphides, and large volumetric expansion upon insertion of the Li ion. In the designed electrode, polydopamine (PD)-coated S nanosheets (NSs) were used as active materials, carboxylic acid functionalized multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT-COOH) as conductive additives, and poly-(acrylic acid) (PAA) as binders. Far different from the traditional hydrogen bond and/or van der Waals force linked electrodes, stronger covalent bonds formed by cross-linking of PD/MWCNT-COOH and PD/PAA into amide bonds, respectively, were built throughout the whole electrode to firmly integrate all of the individual components in the electrode together. As a result, the cathode demonstrated excellent cyclic performance with a charge capacity of 640 inAh/g after 500 cycles at a current density of 1 A/g. Besides, the charge capacity decay after 500 cycles is as small as 0.021% per cycle, which represents the best capacity retention so far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据