4.8 Article

Enhanced Lithium Ion Battery Cycling of Silicon Nanowire Anodes by Template Growth to Eliminate Silicon Underlayer Islands

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 5740-5747

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl4036498

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; anode; silicon nanowire; silicon island; anodic aluminum oxide template

资金

  1. Nanostructures for Electrical Energy Storage, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DESC0001160]
  3. Los Alamos National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC52-06NA25396]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well-known that one-dimensional nanostructures reduce pulverization of silicon (SO-based anode materials during Li ion cycling because they allow lateral relaxation. However, even with improved designs, Si nano-wirebased structures still exhibit limited cycling stability for extended numbers of cycles, with the specific capacity retention with cycling not showing significant improvements over commercial carbon-based anode materials. We have found that one important reason for the lack of long cycling stability can be the presence of milli- and microscale Si islands which typically form under nanowire arrays during their growth. Stress buildup in these Si island underlayers with cycling results in cracking, and the loss of specific capacity for Si nanowire anodes, due to progressive loss of contact with current collectors. We show that the formation of these parasitic Si islands for Si nanowires grown directly on metal current collectors can be avoided by growth through anodized aluminum oxide templates containing a high density of sub-100 nm nanopores. Using this template approach we demonstrate significantly enhanced cycling stability for Si nanowire-based lithium-ion battery anodes, with retentions of more than similar to 1000 rnA.h/g discharge capacity over 1100 cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据