4.8 Article

Thickness-Dependent Interfacial Coulomb Scattering in Atomically Thin Field-Effect Transistors

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 3546-3552

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl4010783

关键词

Two-dimensional material; chalcogenide; field-effect transistor; electrical transport; scattering mechanism

资金

  1. FIRST Program from the JSPS
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23310083] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional semiconductors are structurally ideal channel materials for the ultimate atomic electronics after silicon era. A long-standing puzzle is the low carrier mobility (mu) in them as compared with corresponding bulk structures, which constitutes the main hurdle for realizing high-performance devices. To address this issue, we perform a combined experimental and theoretical study on atomically thin MoS2 field effect transistors with varying the number of MoS2 layers (NLs). Experimentally, an intimate mu-NL relation is observed with a 10-fold degradation in mu. for extremely thinned monolayer channels. To accurately describe the carrier scattering process and shed light on the origin of the thinning-induced mobility degradation, a generalized Coulomb scattering model is developed with strictly considering device configurative conditions, that is, asymmetric dielectric environments and lopsided carrier distribution. We reveal that the carrier scattering from interfacial Coulomb impurities (e.g., chemical residues, gaseous adsorbates, and surface dangling bonds) is greatly intensified in extremely thinned channels, resulting from shortened interaction distance between impurities and carriers. Such a pronounced factor may surpass lattice phonons and serve as dominant scatterers. This understanding offers new insight into the thickness induced scattering intensity, highlights the critical role of surface quality in electrical transport, and would lead to rational performance improvement strategies for future atomic electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据