4.8 Article

Independent Control of Bulk and Interfacial Morphologies of Small Molecular Weight Organic Heterojunction Solar Cells

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 4366-4371

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl302172w

关键词

Organic photovoltaic; squaraine; fullerene; annealing; small-molecule organic semiconductor; polaron-pair recombination

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  2. Center for Solar and Thermal Energy Conversion at the University of Michigan [DE-SC00000957]
  3. NSF SOLAR
  4. Global Photonic Energy Corp.
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0934098] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Chemistry [0934098] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate that solvent vapor annealing of small molecular weight organic heterojunctions can be used to independently control the interface and bulk thin-film morphologies, thereby modifying charge transport and exciton dissociation in these structures. As an example, we anneal diphenyl-functionalized squaraine (DPSQ)/C-60 heterojunctions before or after the deposition of C. Solvent vapor annealing of DPSQ before C-60 deposition results in molecular order at the heterointerface. Organic photovoltaics based on this process have reduced open circuit voltages and power conversion efficiencies relative to as-cast devices. In contrast, annealing following C-60 deposition locks in interface disorder found in unannealed junctions while improving order in the thin-film bulk. This results in an increase in short circuit current by >30% while maintaining the open circuit voltage of the as-cast heterojunction device. These results are analyzed in terms of recombination dynamics at excitonic heterojunctions and demonstrate that the optimal organic photovoltaic morphology is characterized by interfacial disorder to minimize polaron-pair recombination, while improved crystallinity in the bulk increases exciton and charge transport efficiency in the active region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据