4.8 Article

Comparison of Carrier Multiplication Yields in PbS and PbSe Nanocrystals: The Role of Competing Energy-Loss Processes

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 622-628

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl203367m

关键词

Carrier multiplication; multiple exciton generation; Auger recombination; hot exciton cooling

资金

  1. Center for Advanced Solar Photophysics (CASP)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
  3. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)
  4. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, BES, DOE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infrared band gap semiconductor nanocrystals are promising materials for exploring generation III photovoltaic concepts that rely on carrier multiplication or multiple exciton generation, the process in which a single high-energy photon generates more than one electron-hole pair. In this work, we present measurements of carrier multiplication yields and biexciton lifetimes for a large selection of PbS nanocrystals and compare these results to the well-studied PbSe nanocrystals. The similar bulk properties of PbS and PbSe make this an important comparison for discerning the pertinent properties that determine efficient carrier multiplication. We observe that PbS and PbSe have very similar biexciton lifetimes as a function of confinement energy. Together with the similar bulk properties, this suggests that the rates of multiexciton generation, which is the inverse of Auger recombination, are also similar. The carrier multiplication yields in PbS nanocrystals, however, are strikingly lower than those observed for PbSe nanocrystals. We suggest that this implies the rate of competing processes, such as phonon emission, is higher in PbS nanocrystals than in PbSe nanocrystals. Indeed, our estimations for phonon emission mediated by the polar Frohlich-type interaction indicate that the corresponding energy-loss rate is approximately twice as large in PbS than in PbSe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据