4.8 Article

A Novel Clinically Translatable Fluorescent Nanoparticle for Targeted Molecular Imaging of Tumors in Living Subjects

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 281-286

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl203526f

关键词

Nanoprobes; fluorescence; renal clearance; clinical translation; molecular imaging

资金

  1. NCI/NIH [R21 CAl21842]
  2. NCI of Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence (CCNE) [US4 CA119367]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2010121012]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of quantum dots (QDs) in biomedical research has grown tremendously, yet successful examples of clinical applications are absent due to many clinical concerns. Here, we report on a new type of stable and biocompatible dendron-coated InP/ZnS core/shell QD as a clinically translatable nanoprobe for molecular imaging applications. The QDs (QD710-Dendron) were demonstrated to hold several significant features: near-infrared (NIR) emission, high stability in biological media, suitable size with possible renal clearance, and ability of extravasation. More importantly, a pilot mouse toxicity study confirmed that QD710-Dendron lacks significant toxicity at the doses tested. The acute tumor uptake of QD710-Dendron resulted in good contrast from the surrounding nonturnorous tissues, indicating the possibility of passive targeting of the QDs. The highly specific targeting of D710-Dendron-RGD(2) to integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-positive tumor cells resulted in high tumor uptake and long retention of the nanoprobe at tumor sites. In summary, QD710-Dendron and RGD-modified nanoparticles demonstrate small size, high stability, biocompatibility, favorable in vivo pharmacokinetics, and successful tumor imaging properties. These features satisfy the requirements for clinical translation and should promote efforts to further investigate the possibility of using QD710-Dendron-based nanoprobes in the clinical setting in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据