4.8 Article

Apparent Versus True Carrier Multiplication Yields in Semiconductor Nanocrystals

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 2049-2057

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl100177c

关键词

Carrier multiplication; PbSe nanocrystals; charge separation; charged exciton; time-resolved photoluminescence; Auger recombination

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
  2. Los Alamos National Laboratory Directed Research and Development Funds
  3. Chemical Sciences, Biosciences, and Geosciences Division of BES, U.S. DOE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Generation of multiple electron hole pairs (excitons) by single photons, known as carrier multiplication (CM), has the potential to appreciably improve the performance of solar photovoltaics. In semiconductor nanocrystals, this effect usually has been detected using a distinct dynamical signature of multiexcitons associated with their fast Auger recombination, Here, we show that uncontrolled photocharging of the nanocrystal core can lead to exaggeration of the Auger decay component and, as a result, significant deviations of the apparent CM efficiencies from their true values. Specifically, we observe that for the same sample, apparent multiexciton yields can differ by a factor of 3 depending on whether the nanocrystal solution is static or stirred. We show that this discrepancy is consistent with photoinduced charging of the nanocrystals in static solutions, the effect of which is minimized in the stirred case where the charged nanocrystals are swept from the excitation volume between sequential excitation pulses. Using side-by-side measurements of CM efficiencies and nanocrystal charging, we show that the CM results obtained under static conditions converge to the values measured for stirred solutions after we accurately account for the effects of photocharging. This study helps to clarify the recent controversy over CM in nanocrystals and highlights some of the issues that must be carefully considered in spectroscopic studies of this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据