4.8 Article

Variations in the Quantum Efficiency of Multiple Exciton Generation for a Series of Chemically Treated PbSe Nanocrystal Films

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 836-845

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl803600v

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences within the Department of Energy
  2. DOE EERE photovoltaics program
  3. DARPA grant
  4. Department of Energy [DE-AC36-086028308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study multiple exciton generation (MEG) in two series of chemically treated PbSe nanocrystal (NC) films. We find that the average number of excitons produced per absorbed photon varies between 1.0 and 2.4 (+/- 0.2) at a photon energy of similar to 4E(g) for films consisting of 3.7 nm NCs and between 1.1 and 1.6 (+/- 0.1) at by similar to 5E(g) for films consisting of 7.4 nm NCs. The variations in MEG depend upon the chemical treatment used to electronically couple the NCs in each film. The single and multiexciton lifetimes also change with the chemical treatment: biexciton lifetimes increase with stronger inter-NC electronic coupling and exciton delocalization, while single exciton lifetimes decrease after most treatments relative to the same NCs in solution. Single exciton lifetimes are particularly affected by surface treatments that dope the films n-type, which we tentatively attribute to an Auger recombination process between a single exciton and an electron produced by ionization of the dopant donor. These results imply that a better understanding of the effects of surface chemistry on film doping, NC carrier dynamics, and inter-NC interactions is necessary to build solar energy conversion devices that can harvest the multiple carriers produced by MEG. Our results show that the MEG efficiency is very sensitive to the condition of the NC surface and suggest that the wide range of MEG efficiencies reported in the recent literature may be a result of uncontrolled differences in NC surface chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据