4.5 Review

Practical considerations on current guidelines for the management of non-neutropenic adult patients with candidaemia

期刊

MYCOSES
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 11-20

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2012.02208.x

关键词

candidaemia; treatment; guideline; echinocandin; azole

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF) [01KN1106]
  2. Actelion
  3. Astellas
  4. Basilea
  5. Bayer
  6. Biocryst
  7. Celgene
  8. F2G
  9. Genzyme
  10. Gilead
  11. Merck/Schering
  12. Miltenyi
  13. Optimer
  14. Pfizer
  15. Quintiles
  16. Viropharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent guideline recommendations on the management of candidaemia provide valuable treatment guidance for routine clinical practice, but need to be interpreted in the light of the actual situation of the patient and the local epidemiology of fungal infections. Echinocandins emerge as the generally preferred primary treatment. Treatment should be initiated immediately after notification of a Candida-positive blood culture in all patients. Ambiguous issues include the definition of optimum duration of treatment, the indication and time point to step down to oral azoles, catheter management, and the appropriate approach in critically ill patients at high risk for candidaemia in the absence of definitive proof of infection. Patients with clinical suspicion of antifungal treatment failure need prompt workup for adequacy of treatment, focal sources of sustained infection and potential superinfection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据