4.0 Article

Morphological, molecular and biological characterization of Esteya vermicola, a nematophagous fungus isolated from intercepted wood packing materials exported from Brazil

期刊

MYCOSCIENCE
卷 55, 期 5, 页码 367-377

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.myc.2014.01.002

关键词

Bursaphelenchus; Exotic interception; Germination mode; Infection; ISPM

类别

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB127501]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201103018]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371922]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nematophagous fungus Esteya vermicola, strain NKF 13222, was purified from an isolate of Bursaphelenchus rainulfi which was intercepted from wood packaging materials originating in Brazil and arriving at Tianjin port in China. The fungus produced two types of conidiogenous cells and conidia, each with different germination modes. More lunate adhesive conidia than bacilloid conidia were produced on nutrient-poor water agar medium. Morphological comparisons revealed the NKF 13222 strain closely resembled the Taiwan strain E. vermicola (ATCC 74485) previously isolated from the pinewood nematode B. xylophilus. Phylogenetic analysis of the p-tubulin and elongation factor 1-alpha genes indicated that the NKF 13222 grouped with other strains of E. vermicola including the Taiwan strain. This was the first record of E. vermicola from B. rainulfi in South America. Infection tests demonstrated that NKF 13222 was more infective to aphelenchid than tylenchid nematodes and that only lunate adhesive conidia were infectious. The results suggest that the fungus might be a pathogen of plant parasitic nematodes with a broad distribution and provide new information for the potential biocontrol of plant diseases caused by B. xylophilus, Aphelenchoides spp. and Ditylenchus destructor. (C) 2014 The Mycological Society of Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据