4.5 Article

Effect of competitive interactions between ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi on Castanea sativa performance

期刊

MYCORRHIZA
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 41-49

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00572-011-0379-x

关键词

Pisolithus tinctorius; Hypholoma fasciculare; Fungal interaction; Castanea sativa; Biomass production

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [PTDC/AGR-AAM/099556/2008]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AGR-AAM/099556/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Northeast of Portugal, the macrofungal community associated to chestnut tree (Castanea sativa Mill.) is rich and diversified. Among fungal species, the ectomycorrhizal Pisolithus tinctorius and the saprotroph Hypholoma fasciculare are common in this habitat. The aim of the present work was to assess the effect of the interaction between both fungi on growth, nutritional status, and physiology of C. sativa seedlings. In pot experiments, C. sativa seedlings were inoculated with P. tinctorius and H. fasciculare individually or in combination. Inoculation with P. tinctorius stimulated the plant growth and resulted in increased foliar-N, foliar-P, and photosynthetic pigment contents. These effects were suppressed when H. fasciculare was simultaneously applied with P. tinctorius. This result could be related to the inhibition of ectomycorrhizal fungus root colonization as a result of antagonism or to the competition for nutrient sources. If chestnut seedlings have been previously inoculated with P. tinctorius, the subsequent inoculation of H. fasciculare 30 days later did not affect root colonization, and mycorrhization benefits were observed. This work confirms an antagonistic interaction between ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi with consequences on the ectomycorrhizal host physiology. Although P. tinctorius is effective in promoting growth of host trees by establishing mycorrhizae, in the presence of other fungi, it may not always be able to interact with host roots due to an inability to compete with certain fungi.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据