4.5 Article

Candida albicans and Non-C. albicans Candida Species: Comparison of Biofilm Production and Metabolic Activity in Biofilms, and Putative Virulence Properties of Isolates from Hospital Environments and Infections

期刊

MYCOPATHOLOGIA
卷 175, 期 3-4, 页码 265-272

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-013-9638-z

关键词

Candida spp.; Hospital environments; Biofilm; Hemolysin; Antifungals; Virulence

类别

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais-FAPEMIG [APQ-01684-08 e APQ-00518-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Candida albicans and, more recently, non-C. albicans Candida spp. are considered the most frequent fungi in hospitals. This study analyzed Candida spp. isolates and compared the frequency of different species, that is, C. albicans and non-C. albicans Candida spp., and the origins of isolates, that is, from hospital environments or infections. Yeast virulence factors were evaluated based on biofilm production and metabolic activity. Hemolysin production and the antifungal susceptibility profiles of isolates were also evaluated. Candida spp. were highly prevalent in samples collected from hospital environments, which may provide a reservoir for continuous infections with these yeasts. There were no differences in the biofilm productivity levels and metabolic activities of the environmental and clinical isolates, although the metabolic activities of non-C. albicans Candida spp. biofilms were greater than those of the C. albicans biofilms (p < 0.05). Clinical samples had higher hemolysin production (p < 0.05) and lower susceptibility to fluconazole (p < 0.05). Non-C. albicans Candida spp. predominated in samples collected from hospital environments and infections (p < 0.05). These species had a lower susceptibility to fluconazole and amphotericin B, and their biofilms had higher metabolic activities than those produced by C. albicans, which may explain the increased incidence of fungal infections with these yeasts during recent years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据