4.2 Article

Periglandula, a new fungal genus within the Clavicipitaceae and its association with Convolvulaceae

期刊

MYCOLOGIA
卷 103, 期 5, 页码 1133-1145

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3852/11-031

关键词

Clavicipitaceae; Ergoline alkaloids; ergot alkaloids; Ipomoea asarifolia; molecular systematics; Periglandula ipomoeae; P. turbinae; symbiosis; Turbina corymbosa

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  3. United States National Institute of General Medical Science [1R01GM086888-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe two newly discovered fungi living on the adaxial leaf surface of plants belonging to the Convolvulaceae, Ipomoea asarifolia and Turbina corymbosa. The fungi apparently are epibionts because hyphae were never observed to penetrate epidermal cells or stomata of their respective host plants, and most remarkably are intimately associated with secretory glands on the leaf surface. Hyphae and structures resembling chlamydospores and synnemata (but lacking conidia), formed by both fungal species are phenotypically nearly indistinguishable after in vitro growth or when examined in vivo on the leaf surface. Phylogenetic trees based on aligned DNA sequences from nuclear genes for 8-tubulin (lubB) and RNA Polymerase II subunit 1 (rpbA), and the mitochondrial gene for ATP synthase F0 subunit A (atp6), grouped the fungal species in a clade within the Clavicipitaceae. Clavicipitaceous fungi isolated from the two different plant species could be distinguished by their (46 and rpbA sequences, and nuclear genes for gamma-actin (actG), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tefA), and 4-(gamma,gamma-dimethylallyl) tryptophan synthase (dmaW), the determinant step in ergoline (i.e. ergot) alkaloid biosynthesis. Based on these findings we propose a new fungal genus, Periglandula, gen. nov., and describe two new species, Periglandula ipomoette sp. nov., from host plant I. asarifolia, and Periglandula turbinae sp. nov., from T corymbosa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据