4.1 Article

Genotoxicity of TiO2 anatase nanoparticles in B6C3F1 male mice evaluated using Pig-a and flow cytometric micronucleus assays

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.02.002

关键词

Titanium dioxide nanoparticles; Phosphatidylinositol glycan class A gene; Flow cytometry; CD24; %MN-RET frequency; In vivo genotoxicity assays

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan
  2. CORES from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vivo micronucleus and Pig-a (phosphatidylinositol glycan, class A gene) mutation assays were conducted to evaluate the genotoxicity of 10 nm titanium dioxide anatase nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) in mice. Groups of five 6-7-week-old male B6C3F1 mice were treated intravenously for three consecutive days with 0.5, 5.0, and 50 mg/kg TiO2-NPs for the two assays: mouse blood was sampled one day before the treatment and on Day 4, and Weeks 1,2, 4, and 6 after the beginning of the treatment: Pig-a mutant frequencies were determined at Day -1 and Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6, while percent micronucleated-reticulocyte (%MN-RET) frequencies were measured on Day 4 only. Additional animals were treated intravenously with three daily doses of 50 mg/kg TiO2-NPs for the measurement of titanium levels in bone marrow after 4, 24, and 48 h of the last treatment. The measurement indicated that the accumulation of the nanoparticles reached the peak in the tissue 4 h after the administration and the levels were maintained for a few days. No increase in either Pig-a mutant frequency or the frequency of %MN-RETs was detected, although the %RETs was reduced in the treated animals on Day 4 in a dose-dependent manner indicating cytotoxicity of TiO2-NPs in the bone marrow. These results suggest that although TiO2-NPs can reach the mouse bone marrow and are capable of inducing cytotoxicity, the nanoparticles are not genotoxic when assessed with in vivo micronucleus and Pig-a gene mutation tests. Published by Elsevier

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据