4.1 Article

Accumulation of true single strand breaks and AP sites in base excision repair deficient cells

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.08.008

关键词

Alkylating agent; AP sites; Base excision repair; Single strand breaks; O-hydroxylamine

资金

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Science [T32-ES07126, P42-ES05948, P30-ES10126]
  2. National Cancer Institute [T32-CA72319]
  3. Environmental Protection Agency Science to Achieve Results [FP-91643601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single strand breaks (SSBs) are one of the most frequent DNA lesions caused by endogenous and exogenous agents The most utilized alkaline-based assays for SSB detection frequently give false positive results due to the presence of alkali-labile sites that are converted to SSBs Methoxyamine an acidic O-hydroxylamine has been utilized to measure DNA damage in cells However the neutralization of methoxyamine is required prior to usage Here we developed a convenient specific SSB assay using alkaline gel electrophoresis (AGE) coupled with a neutral O-hydroxylamine O-(tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl)hydroxylamine (OTX) OTX stabilizes abasic sites (AP sites) to prevent their alkaline incision while still allowing for strong alkaline DNA denaturation DNA from DT40 and isogenic polymerase beta null cells exposed to methyl methanesulfonate were applied to the OTX-coupled AGE (OTX-AGE) assay Time-dependent Increases in SSBs were detected in each cell line with more extensive SSB formation in the null cells These findings were supported by an assay that indirectly detects SSBs through measuring NAD(P)H depletion An ARP-slot blot assay demonstrated a significant time-dependent increase in AP sites in both cell lines by 1 mM MMS compared to control Furthermore the Pol beta-null cells displayed greater AP site formation than the parental DT40 cells OTX use represents a facile approach for assessing SSB formation whose benefits can also be applied to other established SSB assays (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据