4.1 Article

Characteristics of loci and individuals are associated with germline microsatellite mutation rates in lesser kestrels (Falco naumanni)

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.09.012

关键词

Falco naumanni; Germline; Lesser kestrel; Microsatellite; Mutation

资金

  1. CSIC
  2. Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha/European Social Fund
  3. [CGL2005-05611-C02-02/BOS]
  4. [PAI05-053 (JCCM)]
  5. [PCI08-0130-3954]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although microsatellites are one of the most popular tools in genetic studies, their mutational dynamics and evolution remain unclear. Here, we apply extensive pedigree genotyping to identify and analyze the patterns and factors associated with de novo germline mutations across nine microsatellite loci in a wild population of lesser kestrels (Falco naumanni). A total of 10 germline mutations events were unambiguously identified in four loci, yielding an average mutation rate of 2.96 x 10(-1). Across loci, mutation rate was positively correlated with locus variability and average allele size. Mutations were primarily compatible with a stepwise mutation model, although not exclusively involved single-step changes. Unexpectedly, we found an excess of maternally transmitted mutations (male-to-female ratio of 0.1). One of the analyzed loci (Fn2.14) resulted hypermutable (mutation rate = 0.87%). This locus showed a size-dependent mutation bias, with longer alleles displaying deletions or additions of a small number of repeat than shorter alleles. Mutation probability at Fn2.14 was higher for females and increased with parental (maternal) age but was not associated with individual physical condition, multilocus heterozygosity, allele length or allele span. Overall, our results do not support the male-biased mutation rate described in other organisms and suggest that mutation dynamics at microsatellite loci are a complex process which requires further research. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据