4.7 Article

High surface adsorption properties of carbon-based nanomaterials are responsible for mortality, swimming inhibition, and biochemical responses in Artemia salina larvae

期刊

AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
卷 163, 期 -, 页码 121-129

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.03.014

关键词

Biochemical biomarkers; Carbon-based nanomaterials; Mortality; Swimming inhibition

资金

  1. Slovene Human Resources Development and Scholarship Fund
  2. European Community Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [263147]
  3. RITMARE (Ricerca Italiana per il MARE) Flagship Project, a National Research Programme - Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effects of three different carbon-based nanomaterials on brine shrimp (Anemia sauna) larvae. The larvae were exposed to different concentrations of carbon black, graphene oxide, and multiwall carbon nanotubes for 48 h, and observed using phase contrast and scanning electron microscopy. Acute (mortality) and behavioural (swimming speed alteration) responses and cholinesterase, glutathione-S-transferase and catalase enzyme activities were evaluated. These nanomaterials were ingested and concentrated in the gut, and attached onto the body surface of the A. sauna larvae. This attachment was responsible for concentration-dependent inhibition of larval swimming, and partly for alterations in the enzyme activities, that differed according to the type of tested nanomaterials. No lethal effects were observed up to 0.5 mg/mL carbon black and 0.1 mg/mL multiwall carbon nanotubes, while graphene oxide showed a threshold whereby it had no effects at 0.6 mg/mL, and more than 90% mortality at 0.7 mg/mL. Risk quotients calculated on the basis of predicted environmental concentrations indicate that carbon black and multiwall carbon nanotubes currently do not pose a serious risk to the marine environment, however if uncontrolled release of nanomaterials continues, this scenario can rapidly change. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据