4.3 Article

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of beta-amyloid metabolism in multiple sclerosis

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 543-552

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458512460603

关键词

Amyloid beta; amyloid precursor protein; APP metabolism; biomarkers; cerebrospinal fluid; multiple sclerosis; natalizumab; mitoxantrone; relapsing-remitting MS; secondary progressive MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Amyloid precursor protein (APP) and amyloid beta (A beta) peptides are intensely studied in neuroscience and their cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measurements may be used to track the metabolic pathways of APP in vivo. Reduced CSF levels of A beta and soluble APP (sAPP) fragments are reported in inflammatory diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS); but in MS, the precise pathway of APP metabolism and whether it can be affected by disease-modifying treatments remains unclear. Objective: To characterize the CSF biomarkers of APP degradation in MS, including the effects of disease-modifying therapy. Methods: CSF samples from 87 MS patients (54 relapsing-remitting (RR) MS; 33 secondary progressive (SP) MS and 28 controls were analyzed for sAPP and A beta peptides by immunoassays, plus a subset of samples was analyzed by immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry (IP-MS). Patients treated with natalizumab or mitoxantrone were examined at baseline, and after 1-2 years of treatment. Results: CSF sAPP and A beta peptide levels were reduced in MS patients; but they increased again towards normal, after natalizumab treatment. A multivariate model of IP-MS-measured A beta species separated the SPMS patients from controls, with RRMS patients having intermediate levels. Conclusions: We confirmed and extended our previous observations of altered CSF sAPP and A beta peptide levels in MS patients. We found that natalizumab therapy may be able to counteract the altered APP metabolism in MS. The CSF A beta isoform distribution was found to be distinct in SPMS patients, as compared to the controls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据