4.3 Article

Setting a research agenda for progressive multiple sclerosis: The International Collaborative on Progressive MS

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 11, 页码 1534-1540

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458512458169

关键词

multiple sclerosis; progressive multiple sclerosis; neuroprotection; rehabilitation; research agenda

资金

  1. Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM)
  2. MS Society of Canada
  3. MS International Federation
  4. MS Research Foundation (The Netherlands)
  5. UK MS Society
  6. National MS Society (USA)
  7. Novartis
  8. MS Society of GB NI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite significant progress in the development of therapies for relapsing MS, progressive MS remains comparatively disappointing. Our objective, in this paper, is to review the current challenges in developing therapies for progressive MS and identify key priority areas for research. A collaborative was convened by volunteer and staff leaders from several MS societies with the mission to expedite the development of effective disease-modifying and symptom management therapies for progressive forms of multiple sclerosis. Through a series of scientific and strategic planning meetings, the collaborative identified and developed new perspectives on five key priority areas for research: experimental models, identification and validation of targets and repurposing opportunities, proof-of-concept clinical trial strategies, clinical outcome measures, and symptom management and rehabilitation. Our conclusions, tackling the impediments in developing therapies for progressive MS will require an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach to enable effective translation of research into therapies for progressive MS. Engagement of the MS research community through an international effort is needed to address and fund these research priorities with the ultimate goal of expediting the development of disease-modifying and symptom-relief treatments for progressive MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据