4.3 Article

HLA, PTPN22 and PD-1 associations as markers of autoimmunity in neuromyelitis optica

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 23-30

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458511417480

关键词

anti-aquaporin-4; Caucasians; HLA; genetic; multiple sclerosis; neuromyelitis optica

资金

  1. Danish Foundation for Neurological Research
  2. Ole Jacobsen Commemoration Foundation
  3. Sonderborg Hospital
  4. Vejle Hospital
  5. Esbjerg Hospital of The Region of Southern Denmark
  6. Sonderborg Hospital of The Region of Southern Denmark
  7. Vejle Hospital of The Region of Southern Denmark
  8. University of Southern Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a disease with autoimmune characteristics. A genetic autoimmune dependency for NMO has not been clarified in detail. Objective: To investigate immunogenetic aspects of NMO. Methods: Forty-one patients with NMO and 42 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were diagnosed in a population-based Caucasian cohort. HLA DQA1, DQB1, and DRB1 alleles were determined. Polymorphisms in programmed death 1 (PD-1) PD-1.3 G/A and protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor 22 (PTPN22) 1858 C/T were genotyped. Results: In the NMO group 15% had other autoimmune disorders and 39% had family occurrence of autoimmunity, comparable to MS. A higher frequency of a family history (17%) of NMO and MS was found in the NMO group (p<0.026). The frequency of HLA-DQB1*0402 allele was increased in NMO (p after Bonferroni correction, cp<0.035) and the HLA-DRB1*15 and DQB1*06 alleles were increased in MS (cp<0.0027, cp<0.01), compared to controls. No associations of the PTPN22 1858 T were detected. The PD-1.3A allele was increased both in NMO (p<0.0023) and in MS patients (p<0.028) compared to controls. Conclusion: Patients with NMO had frequent co-existence of autoimmunity and family occurrence of NMO and MS. The PD-1.3A allele was associated with NMO. The data suggest genetic autoimmune dependency of NMO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据