4.3 Article

Reproducibility of high-resolution optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 829-839

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458510371640

关键词

Demyelinating disease (CNS); multiple sclerosis; neuro-ophthalmology; optic nerve; axonal loss; outcome measurement

资金

  1. National Multiple Sclerosis Society [TR3760-A3]
  2. Nancy Davis Foundation
  3. DAD's Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive method to quantify neurodegeneration as an outcome in multiple sclerosis clinical trials; however, no data exist on Cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) reproducibility in patients with multiple sclerosis. The objective of this study was to determine the protocol for achieving optimal inter-visit, inter-rater, and intra-rater reproducibility for studies performed on healthy controls and multiple sclerosis patients utilizing novel high-definition SD-OCT. This is a prospective study of inter-visit, inter-rater, and intra-rater reproducibility in multiple sclerosis patients (n=58) and healthy controls (n=32) on Cirrus-HD SD-OCT. Excellent reproducibility of average and quadrantic retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness values, average macular thickness (AMT), and total macular volume (TMV) [measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] was found for inter-visit (healthy controls: mean RNFL=0.97, quadrant range=0.92-0.97, AMT=0.97, TMV=0.92), inter-rater (MS: mean RNFL=0.97, quadrant=0.94-0.98, AMT=0.99, TMV=0.96; healthy controls: mean RNFL=0.97, quadrant 0.94-0.97, AMT=0.98, TMV=0.99), and intra-rater (MS patients: mean RNFL=0.99, quadrant=0.83-0.99, AMT=0.97, TMV=0.98) reproducibility. The reproducibility of retinal measures derived by Cirrus HD-OCT, especially quadrantic values, is excellent. Specific procedures for OCT acquisition and analysis of retinal imaging metrics using SD-OCT technology may improve the application of this novel technology in multiple sclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据