4.3 Article

Magnetic resonance active lesions as individual-level surrogate for relapses in multiple sclerosis

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 541-549

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458510391837

关键词

interferon (IFN); surrogacy; treatment effect

资金

  1. Merck Serono SA, Geneva, Switzerland
  2. Merck Serono
  3. Biogen Idec
  4. Actelion
  5. Teva
  6. University of British Columbia MS/MRI Research Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Use of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics as surrogates for clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis (MS) trials is controversial. Objectives: We sought to validate, at the individual-patient level, the number of MRI active lesions, as a surrogate marker for relapses in MS. Methods: Individual-patient data from two large, placebo-controlled clinical trials of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive (SP) MS were analysed separately and as pooled data. The four Prentice criteria were applied to assess surrogacy for the number of new T2 MRI lesions. The predictive value of short-term treatment effects on this MRI marker for longer-term clinical relapses was also assessed. Results: All Prentice criteria were satisfied. The number of new T2 MRI lesions correlated with the number of relapses over the follow-up period. The proportion of treatment effect on relapses accounted for by the effect of treatment on new T2 MRI lesions over 2 years was 53% in patients with relapsing-remitting MS, 67% in patients with secondary progressive MS, and 62% in pooled data. In the pooled data, treatment effects on new lesions over 1 year mediated a good proportion (70%) of effects on relapses over the subsequent year. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that new T2 MRI lesion count is a surrogate for relapses in patients with MS treated with interferon or drugs with a similar mechanism of action. Short-term treatment effects on this MRI measure can predict longer-term effects on relapses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据