4.3 Article

Higher levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D are associated with a lower incidence of multiple sclerosis only in women

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 9-15

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458508095920

关键词

1,25(OH)(2)D; 25(OH)D; multiple sclerosis; sex difference; vitamin D

资金

  1. Dutch MS Research Foundation [nr 02-492]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with an as yet not fully understood etiological background. The geographical distribution of MS is striking with a prevalence that increases with latitude. For this reason, vitamin D deficiency is considered a possible pathogenic co-factor in MS. Materials and methods To study the role of the vitamin D metabolism in MS, blood samples were taken twice (summer and winter) from 103 patients with MS and 110 healthy controls. Serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)(2)D) were measured, and detailed information on disease characteristics and environmental factors that might influence the vitamin D metabolite levels was collected. Results Mean serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)(2)D concentrations were significantly higher in summer compared to winter in both patients and controls. Using logistic regression methods, we found that in women for every 10 nmol/L increase of serum 25(OH)D level the odds of MS was reduced by 19% (odds ratio 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.95), suggesting a protective effect of higher 25(OH)D serum levels. In addition, also restricted to women, a negative correlation was found between Expanded Disability Status Scale and 25(OH)D levels (r = -0.29, P = 0.020). Conclusions Our data suggest that higher circulating levels of 25(OH)D are associated with a lower incidence of MS and MS-related disability in women. This may imply clues to the pathogenesis of the sex difference in risk and to the nature of the environmental factors involved in MS. Multiple Sclerosis 2009;15:9-15. http://msj.sagepub.com

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据