4.3 Article

Disease progression among multiple sclerosis patients before and during a disease-modifying drug program: a longitudinal population-based evaluation

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 1286-1294

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458509350307

关键词

multiple sclerosis; treatment effectiveness; population health; public health; chronic diseases; disease-modifying drugs

资金

  1. Health Policy Research Program, Health Canada
  2. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
  3. Nova Scotia Department of Health
  4. Alberta Heritage Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) in persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and secondary progressive MS with superimposed relapses. However, these brief studies of selected patients have focused mainly on reducing attacks and must be complemented by evaluations in 'real-world' clinical settings to establish the effectiveness of DMD programs in slowing disease progression and to inform health policy and program decision-making. We assessed the effectiveness of DMDs as administered in a comprehensive publicly funded drug insurance program that provides DMDs to a geographically defined population of MS patients who meet specific eligibility criteria. Data from 1752 MS patients (10,312 assessments) seen between 1980 and 2004 at a regional MS Clinic serving the entire population of Nova Scotia, Canada were analysed. Using survival methods we observed a statistically significant reduction in disease progression to specific Expanded Disability Status Scale endpoints following the introduction of this program. Subgroup analyses of patients eligible for treatment using hierarchical linear regression methods also suggested that disease progression was slowed in patients treated with the first DMD prescribed. These findings provide evidence supporting DMD program effectiveness that can be used to inform the broader implementation of such programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据