4.3 Article

Neuropsychological dysfunction, depression, physical disability, and coping processes in families with a parent affected by multiple sclerosis

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 1106-1112

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458508093678

关键词

cognition; coping; depression; multiple sclerosis; neuropsychological impairment; physical disability

资金

  1. European Union [QLGT-2001-02378]
  2. Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Families with a parent suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS) must cope with the unpredictable course of the disease. Most studies analyzing factors that influence coping abilities in families with a member affected with MS used questionnaires to assess this ability. Methods On the contrary, the present study used a semi-structured psychiatric interview and used the resulting information to calculate a general measure of coping ability (coping index [CI]). We administered this interview to 44 MS patients, their partners and offspring and conducted a neuropsychological and physical evaluation of the patients to determine the impact of physical disability, cognitive dysfunction, and depression on the process of coping by the patient, the healthy partner, and children. Results The CI of patients was best predicted by measures of their depressive symptoms, divided attention, and estimated verbal intelligence. None of the patient variables predicted the CI of healthy partners or their offspring. We found an association between the CI of the healthy partner and the children. Conclusions These findings suggest that MS patients' emotional and neuropsychological functions are associated with their ability to cope with the disease. These should be carefully assessed at the beginning of treatment so that those factors known to negatively influence patient coping are targeted in the treatment plan if necessary. Comprehensive care of a patient with MS should include support of coping abilities of the family members.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据