4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Avonex Combination Trial in relapsing-remitting MS: rationale, design and baseline data

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 370-382

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458507083189

关键词

clinical trial; interferon beta-1a; methotrexate; methylprednisolone; multiple sclerosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To review the rationale, design and baseline data of the Avonex Combination Trial (ACT), an investigator-run study of intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IM IFN beta-1a) combined with methotrexate (MTX) and/or IV methylprednisolone (IVMP) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients with continued disease activity on IM IFN beta-1a monotherapy. Methods Eligibility criteria included RRMS, Expanded Disability Status Scale score 0-5.5, and >= 1 relapse or gadolinium-enhancing MRI lesion in the prior year while on IM IFN beta-1a monotherapy. Subjects continued IFN beta-1a 30 mcg IM weekly and were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to adjunctive weekly placebo or MTX 20 mg PO, with or without IVMP 1000 mg/day for three days every other month. ACT was industry-supported, and collaboratively designed and governed by an Investigator Steering Committee with independent Advisory and Data Safety Monitoring Committees. Study operations, MRI analysis and aggregated data were managed by the Cleveland Clinic MS Academic Coordinating Center. Results In total 313 subjects were enrolled with clinical and MRI characteristics typical of RRMS. Most subjects (86.9%) qualified with a clinical relapse, with or without an enhancing MRI lesion, in the preceding year. At baseline, 21.4% had enhancing lesions, and 5.1% had anti-IFN beta neutralizing antibodies. ACT's management and operational structures functioned well. Conclusion This study provides an innovative model for academic-industry collaborative MS research and will enhance understanding of the utility of combination therapy for RRMS patients with continued disease activity on an established first-line treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据