4.6 Article

Robust anonymous authentication protocol for health-care applications using wireless medical sensor networks

期刊

MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 49-60

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00530-013-0346-9

关键词

Wireless medical sensor network; Authentication protocol; Smart card

资金

  1. Open Funds of State Key Laboratory of Information Security [2013-3-3]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110141120003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the fast development of wireless communication technologies and semiconductor technologies, the wireless sensor network (WSN) has been widely used in many applications. As an application of the WSN, the wireless medical sensor network (WMSN) could improve health-care quality and has become important in the modern medical system. In the WMSN, physiological data are collected by sensors deployed in the patient's body and sent to health professionals' mobile devices through wireless communication. Then health professionals could get the status of the patient anywhere and anytime. The data collected by sensors are very sensitive and important. The leakage of them could compromise the patient's privacy and their malicious modification could harm the patient's health. Therefore, both security and privacy are two important issues in WMSNs. Recently, Kumar et al. proposed an efficient authentication protocol for health-care applications using WMSNs and claimed that it could withstand various attacks. However, we find that their protocol is vulnerable to the off-line password guessing attack and the privileged insider attack. We also point out that their protocol cannot provide user anonymity. In this paper, we will propose a robust anonymous authentication protocol for health-care applications using WMSNs. Compared with Kumar et al.'s protocol, the proposed protocol has strong security and computational efficiency. Therefore, it is more suitable for health-care applications using WMSNs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据