4.6 Article

MAIT cells are licensed through granzyme exchange to kill bacterially sensitized targets

期刊

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 429-440

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mi.2014.81

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT091663MA]
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (Oxford)
  4. Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine (Oxford)
  5. James Martin School for the 21st Century (Oxford)
  6. National Institutes of Health [NIAD 5U19A082630, AI046553]
  7. Oxford Dominions Trust
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0510-10204] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are an innate-like T-cell population restricted by the non-polymorphic, major histocompatibility complex class I-related protein 1, MR1. MAITcells are activated by a broad range of bacteria through detection of riboflavin metabolites bound by MR1, but their direct cytolytic capacity upon recognition of cognate target cells remains unclear. We showthat resting human MAIT cells are uniquely characterized by a lack of granzyme (Gr) Band low perforin expression, key granule proteins required for efficient cytotoxic activity, but high levels of expression of GrA and GrK. Bacterial activation of MAIT cells rapidly induced GrB and perforin, licensing these cells to kill their cognate target cells. Using a novel flow cytometry-based killing assay, we show that licensed MAITcells, but not ex vivo MAIT cells from the same donors, can efficiently kill Escherichia coli-exposed B-cell lines in an MR1-and degranulation-dependent manner. Finally, we show that MAIT cells are highly proliferative in response to antigenic and cytokine stimulation, maintaining high expression of GrB, perforin, and GrA, but reduced expression of GrK following antigenic proliferation. The tightly regulated cytolytic capacity of MAITcells may have an important role in the control of intracellular bacterial infections, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据