4.6 Article

The glucocerobrosidase E326K variant predisposes to Parkinson's disease, but does not cause Gaucher's disease

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 232-236

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mds.25248

关键词

GBA; E326K; Parkinson's disease; Gaucher's disease; early onset

资金

  1. Alfonso Martin Escudero Foundation (Spain)
  2. UK Medical Research Council
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Wellcome/MRC Parkinson's Disease Consortium
  5. University of Sheffield
  6. MRC Protein Phosphorylation Unit at the University of Dundee [WT089698]
  7. Parkinson's UK [K-0901]
  8. Reta Lila Trust
  9. MRC [MC_G1000735, MR/K025570/1, MR/K015338/1, G0802760, MR/J004758/1, G1001253, G108/638, G0701075] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [G0802760, MR/K015338/1, MC_G1000735, G0701075, G108/638, MR/J004758/1, G1001253] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Parkinson's UK [G-1104, J-0804, K-0901] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in the acid beta-glucocerebrosidase (GBA1) gene, responsible for the recessive lysosomal storage disorder, Gaucher's disease (GD), are the strongest known risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD). Our aim was to assess the contribution of GBA1 mutations in a series of early-onset PD. Methods One hundred and eighty-five PD patients (with an onset age of 50) and 283 age-matched controls were screened for GBA1 mutations by Sanger sequencing. Results We show that the frequency of GBA1 mutations is much higher in this patient series than in typical late-onset patient cohorts. Furthermore, our results reveal that the most prevalent PD-associated GBA1 mutation is E326K, a variant that does not, when homozygous, cause GD. Conclusions Our results confirm recent reports that the mutation, E326K, predisposes to PD and suggest that, in addition to reduced GBA1 activity, other molecular mechanisms may contribute to the development of the disease. (c) 2012 Movement Disorder Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据