4.6 Article

Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-Validation of the Revised Version PDSS-2

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 644-652

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.23476

关键词

Parkinson's disease; sleep; PDSS; validation; nocturnal disturbance; MOS; UPDRS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The previous Parkinson's disease sleep scale (PDSS) is a 15-item visual analogue scale that assesses the profile of nocturnal disturbances in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Objective: To extend the scale so that it becomes a frequency measure scale with five categories and encompasses unmet needs such as restless legs syndrome, akinesia, pain, and sleep apnea. Methods: For validation of the PDSS-2, PD patients' ratings and investigators' interviews were compared to ratings from a semistructured interview with a caregiver/partner, and to related scales. PDSS-2 was repeated for test-retest-reliability after 1-3 days. Results: A total of 113 PD patients showed a mean (SD) total score of 16.5 (+/- 8.9) (range: 2-40) indicating mild to moderate sleep disturbances. PDSS-2 item-total correlation for proving internal consistency was satisfactory (correlations > 0.30). From a factor analysis, three subscales were derived: (1) motor problems at night,'' (2) PD symptoms at night'' and (3) disturbed sleep.'' The alpha coefficient for the total score was 0.73, for subscales 0.47 to 0.66. The test-retest-reliability intra-class-coefficient for the total score was 0.80, with 0.69 and 0.77 within the subscales. For discriminative validity, significant differences were found in the PDSS-2 total score depending on CGI and Hoehn and Yahr severity levels. A comparison between caregivers' and patients' ratings was carried out. Conclusion: The PDSS-2, with an extended spectrum of nocturnal disabilities and easier use for patients, is a reliable, valid, precise, and potentially treatment-responsive tool for measuring sleep disorders in PD. (C) 2011 Movement Disorder Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据