4.4 Review

Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Melanoma

期刊

SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 466-473

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2015.02.008

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ressler Family Fund
  2. Dr. Robert Vigen Memorial Fund
  3. Wesley Coyle Memorial Fund
  4. Garcia-Corsini Family Fund
  5. Stand Up To Cancer Cancer Research Institute Cancer Immunology Dream Team Translational Research Grant [SU2C-AACR-DT1012]
  6. V Foundation-Gil Nickel Family Endowed Fellowship in Melanoma Research
  7. Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) for Translational Research in Reference Centers
  8. [P01 CA168585]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immune-regulatory mechanisms are used by cancer to hide from the immune system. Advances and in-depth understanding of the biology of melanoma and its interaction with the immune system have led to the development of some of antagonistic antibodies to the programmed death 1 pathway (PD-1) and one of its ligands, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), which are demonstrating high clinical benefit rates and tolerability. Blocking the immune-regulatory checkpoints that limit T-cell responses to melanoma upon PD-1/PD-L1 modulation has provided clinically validated targets for cancer immunotherapy. Combinations with other anti-melanoma agents may result in additional benefits. Nivolumab, pembrolizumab (formerly known as MK-3475 and lambrolizumab), and pidilizumab are anti PD-1 antibodies in clinical development for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancers, lymphoma, and several other cancers. Long-term survivors already have been reported with these therapies. In this review, we discuss the current state of anti PD-1 agents, the evidence in the literature to support the combination of anti PD-1 antibodies with other anticancer agents and discuss the future directions for rational design of clinical trials that keep on increasing the number of long-term survivors. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据