4.4 Article

The Effects of Sampling Errors on the EnKF Assimilation of Inner-Core Hurricane Observations

期刊

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
卷 142, 期 4, 页码 1609-1630

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00305.1

关键词

Tropical cyclones; Kalman filters; Ensembles; Mesoscale forecasting; Data assimilation; Model initialization

资金

  1. NOAA Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP)
  2. Office of Naval Research [N000140910526]
  3. National Science Foundation [ATM-0840651]
  4. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1305798] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric data assimilation methods that estimate flow-dependent forecast statistics from ensembles are sensitive to sampling errors. This sensitivity is investigated in the context of vortex-scale hurricane data assimilation by cycling an ensemble Kalman filter to assimilate observations with a convection-permitting mesoscale model. In a set of numerical experiments, airborne Doppler radar observations are assimilated for Hurricane Katrina (2005) using an ensemble size that ranges from 30 to 300 members, and a varying degree of covariance inflation through relaxation to the prior. The range of ensemble sizes is shown to produce variations in posterior storm structure that persist for days in deterministic forecasts, with the most substantial differences appearing in the vortex outer-core wind and pressure fields. Ensembles with 60 or more members converge toward similar axisymmetric and asymmetric inner-core solutions by the end of the cycling, while producing qualitatively similar sample correlations between the state variables. Though covariance relaxation has little impact on model variables far from the observations, the structure of the inner-core vortex can benefit from a more optimal tuning of the relaxation coefficient. Results from this study provide insight into how sampling errors may affect the performance of an ensemble hurricane data assimilation system during cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据