4.4 Article

Controlling the Computational Modes of the Arbitrarily Structured C Grid

期刊

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
卷 140, 期 10, 页码 3220-3234

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00221.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCAS Climate
  2. NERC [NE/H002774/1, NE/H001166/1, NE/I022086/1]
  3. NERC [NE/H015698/1, NE/I022086/1, NE/H001166/1, NE/H002774/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I022086/1, NE/H001166/1, ncas10009, NE/H015698/1, NE/H002774/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The arbitrarily structured C grid, Thuburn-Ringler-Skamarock-Klemp (TRiSK), is being used in the Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS) and is being considered by the Met Office for their next dynamical core. However, the hexagonal C grid supports a branch of spurious Rossby modes, which lead to erroneous grid-scale oscillations of potential vorticity (PV). It is shown how these modes can be harmlessly controlled by using upwind-biased interpolation schemes for PV. A number of existing advection schemes for PV are tested, including that used in MPAS, and none are found to give adequate results for all grids and all cases. Therefore a new scheme is proposed; continuous, linear-upwind stabilized transport (CLUST), a blend between centered and linear-upwind with the blend dependent on the flow direction with respect to the cell edge. A diagnostic of grid-scale oscillations is proposed that gives further discrimination between schemes than using potential enstrophy alone. Indeed, some schemes are found to destroy potential enstrophy while gridscale oscillations grow. CLUST performs well on hexagonal-icosahedral grids and unrotated skipped latitude longitude grids of the sphere for various shallow-water test cases. Despite the computational modes, the hexagonal icosahedral grid performs well since these modes are easy and harmless to filter. As a result, TRiSK appears to perform better than a spectral shallow-water model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据