4.7 Article

Physical properties and optical-infrared transmission spectrum of the giant planet XO-1 b

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2488

关键词

planets and satellites: atmospheres; stars: fundamental parameters; stars: individual: XO-1; planetary systems

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust
  2. Gates Cambridge Trust
  3. Italian Minister of Instruction, University and Research (MIUR) through FFABR 2017 fund
  4. Department of Physics of the University of Rome Tor Vergata, through Mission Sustainability 2016 funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present 10 high-precision light curves of four transits in the XO-1 planetary system, obtained using u, g, r, redshifted H alpha, I, and z filters. We use these to measure the physical properties, orbital ephemeris, and a transmission spectrum of the planet covering the full optical wavelength range. We augment this with published HST/WFC3 observations to construct a transmission spectrum of the planet covering 0.37-1.65 mu m. Our best-fitting model to this spectrum is for a H-2/He-rich atmosphere containing water (3.05 sigma confidence), nitrogen-bearing molecules NH3 and HCN (1.5 sigma) and patchy cloud (1.3 sigma). We find that adding the optical to the near-infrared data does not lead to more precise constraints on the planetary atmosphere in this case. We conduct a detailed investigation into the effect of stellar limb darkening on our results, concluding that the choice of limb darkening law and coefficients is unimportant; such conclusions may not hold for other systems so should be reassessed for all high-quality data sets. The planet radius we measure in the g band is anomalously low and should be investigated with future observations at a higher spectral resolution. From the measured times of transit, we determine an improved orbital ephemeris, calculate a lower limit on the modified stellar tidal quality factor of Q(*)(1) > 10(5.6), and rule out a previously postulated sinusoidal variation in the transit times.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据