4.7 Article

Analytic model for the matter power spectrum, its covariance matrix and baryonic effects

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1972

关键词

neutrinos; methods: analytical; galaxies: haloes; galaxies: statistics; cosmological parameters; large scale structures of Universe

资金

  1. NASA ATP grant [NNX12AG71G]
  2. NASA [NNX12AG71G, 76735] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We develop a model for the matter power spectrum as the sum of Zeldovich approximation and even powers of k, i.e. A(0) -A(2)k(2) + A(4)k(4) -..., compensated at low k. With terms up to k(4), the model can predict the true power spectrum to a few per cent accuracy up to k similar to 0.7 h Mpc(-1), over a wide range of redshifts and models. The A(n) coefficients contain information about cosmology, in particular amplitude of fluctuations. We write a simple form of the covariance matrix as a sum of Gaussian part and A(0) variance, which reproduces the simulations remarkably well. In contrast, we show that one needs an N-body simulation volume of more than 1000 ( Gpc h(-1))(3) to converge to 1 per cent accuracy on covariance matrix. We investigate the supersample variance effect and show it can be modelled as an additional parameter that can be determined from the data. This allows a determination of sigma(8) amplitude to about 0.2 per cent for a survey volume of 1(Gpc h(-1))(3), compared to 0.4 per cent otherwise. We explore the sensitivity of these coefficients to baryonic effects using hydrodynamic simulations of van Daalen et al. We find that because of baryons redistributing matter inside haloes all the coefficients A(2n) for n > 0 are strongly affected by baryonic effects, while A(0) remains almost unchanged, a consequence of halo mass conservation. Our results suggest that observations such as weak lensing power spectrum can be effectively marginalized over the baryonic effects, while still preserving the bulk of the cosmological information contained in A(0) and Zeldovich terms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据