4.7 Article

Defocused transmission spectroscopy: a potential detection of sodium in the atmosphere of WASP-12b

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2149

关键词

methods: data analysis; methods: observational; techniques: spectroscopic; planets and satellites: atmospheres; planets and satellites: individual: WASP-12b, HD 189733b, HD 209458b

资金

  1. Northern Ireland Department of Employment and learning
  2. STFC [ST/L000709/1]
  3. Ramon y Cajal fellowship [RYC-2010-05762]
  4. Spanish MINECO [AYA2012-38700]
  5. STFC [ST/L000709/1, ST/K006126/1, ST/M001970/1, ST/K005758/1, ST/L000733/1, ST/M002012/1, ST/J000027/1, ST/J001589/1, ST/H008527/1, ST/M003515/1, ST/I001719/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000733/1, ST/J001589/1, ST/J000027/1, ST/M003515/1, ST/I001719/1, ST/M001970/1, ST/M002012/1, ST/K006126/1, ST/L000709/1, ST/H008527/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on a pilot study of a novel observing technique, defocused transmission spectroscopy, and its application to the study of exoplanet atmospheres using ground-based platforms. Similar to defocused photometry, defocused transmission spectroscopy has an added advantage over normal spectroscopy in that it reduces systematic errors due to flat-fielding, point spread function variations, slit-jaw imperfections and other effects associated with ground-based observations. For one of the planetary systems studied, WASP-12b, we report a tentative detection of additional Na absorption of 0.12 +/- 0.03[+0.03] per cent during transit using a 2 angstrom wavelength mask. After consideration of a systematic that occurs mid-transit, it is likely that the true depth is actually closer to 0.15 per cent. This is a similar level of absorption reported in the atmosphere of HD 209458b (0.135 +/- 0.017 per cent; Snellen et al. 2008). Finally, we outline methods that will improve the technique during future observations, based on our findings from this pilot study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据