4.7 Article

Improved signal detection algorithms for unevenly sampled data. Six signals in the radial velocity data for GJ876

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu683

关键词

methods: data analysis; stars: activity; stars: individual: GJ876; planetary systems

资金

  1. Fondecyt [3110004, 1120299]
  2. Centro de Astrofisica FONDAP [15010003]
  3. GEMINI-CONICYT FUND, from the Comite Mixto ESO-GOBIERNO DE CHILE
  4. Basal-CATA grant
  5. Conicyt [ACT1120]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hunt for Earth analogue planets orbiting Sun-like stars has forced the introduction of novel methods to detect signals at, or below, the level of the intrinsic noise of the observations. We present a new global periodogram method that returns more information than the classic Lomb-Scargle periodogram method for radial velocity signal detection. Our method uses the minimum mean-squared error as a framework to determine the optimal number of genuine signals present in a radial velocity timeseries using a global search algorithm, meaning that we can discard noise spikes from the data before a follow-up analysis. This method also allows us to determine the phase and amplitude of the signals we detect, meaning that we can track these quantities as a function of time to test if the signals are stationary or non-stationary. We apply our method to the radial velocity data for GJ876 as a test system to highlight how the phase information can be used to select against the non-stationary sources of detected signals in radial velocity data, such as rotational modulation of star spots. Analysis of this system yields two new statistically significant signals in the combined Keck and HARPS velocities with periods of 10 and 15 d. Although a planet with a period of 15 d would relate to a Laplace resonant chain configuration with three of the other planets (8:4:2:1), we stress that the follow-up dynamical analyses are needed to test the reliability of such a six-planet system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据