4.2 Review

Who should we cool after perinatal asphyxia?

期刊

SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 66-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.01.002

关键词

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; Therapeutic hypothermia; Inclusion criteria; Follow-up; Human; Clinical trial

资金

  1. UK charity SPARKS [05BTL01]
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Norwegian Medical Research Council [214356]
  4. Laerdal Foundation for Acute Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three ongoing challenges have arisen after the introduction of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) as standard of care for term newborns with moderate or severe perinatal asphyxia: (i) to ensure that the correct group of infants are cooled; (ii) to optimize the delivery of TH and intensive care in relation to the severity of the encephalopathy; (iii) to systematically follow up the long-term efficacy of TH using comparable outcome data between centers and countries. This review addresses the entry criteria for TH, and discusses potential issues regarding patient selection, and management of TH: cooling mild, moderate, and very severe perinatal asphyxia, cooling longer or deeper, and/or starting with a greater delay. This includes cooling of patients outside of standard trial entry criteria, such as after postnatal collapse, premature infants, those with infection, and infants with metabolic, chromosomal or surgical diagnoses in addition to perinatal asphyxia. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据