4.7 Article

The origin of the young pulsar PSR J0826+2637 and its possible former companion HIP 13962

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt2478

关键词

stars: abundances; stars: individual: HIP 13962; stars: kinematics and dynamics; pulsars: individual: PSR J0826+2637

资金

  1. Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung for a scholarship
  2. DFG in the SFB/TR-7 Gravitational Wave Astronomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We aim to identify the birth place of the young pulsar PSR J0826+2637 in order to determine its kinematic age and give constraints on its radial and spatial (kick) velocity. Since the majority of neutron star (NS) progenitors are in associations or clusters, we search for a possible origin of the NS inside such stellar groups. We trace back the NS and the centres of possible birth associations and clusters to find close encounters. The kinematic age is then given by the time since the encounter. We use Monte Carlo simulations to account for observational uncertainties and the unknown radial velocity of the NS. We evaluate the outcome statistically. In order to find further indication for our findings, we also search for a runaway star that could be the former companion if it exists. We find that PSR J0826+2637 was probably born in the small young cluster Stock 7 similar to 3 Myr ago. This result is supported by the identification of the former companion candidate HIP 13962 (runaway star with spectral type G0Ia). The scenario predicts a near-zero radial velocity of the pulsar implying an inclination angle of its motion to the line of sight of 87 degrees +/- 11 degrees. We also present the chemical abundances of HIP 13962. We do not find enhanced alpha element abundances in the highly evolved star. However, the binary supernova (SN) scenario may be supported by the overabundance of r-process elements that could have been ejected during the SN and accreted by the runaway star. Also, a high rotational velocity of v sin i similar to 29 km s(-1) of HIP 13962 is consistent with evolution in a pre-SN binary system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据