4.7 Article

Deuterium chemistry of dense gas in the vicinity of low-mass and massive star-forming regions

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu1141

关键词

astrochemistry; stars: formation; stars: low-mass; stars: massive; ISM: abundances; ISM: molecules

资金

  1. John Fill OUP research fund [0921267]
  2. (European Community's) Seventh Framework Program [FP7] [238258]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [PALs 320620]
  4. UK Science and Technology Funding Council
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H001794/1, ST/J001511/1, ST/F501761/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [ST/H001794/1, ST/J001511/1, ST/F501761/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The standard interstellar ratio of deuterium to hydrogen (D/H) atoms is similar to 1.5 x 10(-5). However, the deuterium fractionation is in fact found to be enhanced, to different degrees, in cold, dark cores, hot cores around massive star-forming regions, lukewarm cores, and warm cores (hereafter hot corinos) around low-mass star-forming regions. In this paper, we investigate the overall differences in the deuterium chemistry between hot cores and hot corinos. We have modelled the chemistry of dense gas around low-mass and massive star-forming regions using a gas-grain chemical model. We investigate the influence of varying the core density, the depletion efficiency of gaseous species on to dust grains, the collapse mode and the final mass of the protostar on the chemical evolution of star-forming regions. We find that the deuterium chemistry is, in general, most sensitive to variations of the depletion efficiency on to grain surfaces, in agreement with observations. In addition, the results showed that the chemistry is more sensitive to changes in the final density of the collapsing core in hot cores than in hot corinos. Finally, we find that ratios of deuterated sulphur bearing species in dense gas around hot cores and corinos may be good evolutionary indicators in a similar way as their non-deuterated counterparts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据