4.7 Article

ramses-rt: radiation hydrodynamics in the cosmological context

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1722

关键词

radiative transfer; methods: numerical

资金

  1. Marie Curie Initial Training Network ELIXIR of the European Commission [PITN-GA-2008-214227]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union/ERC [278594-GasAroundGalaxies]
  3. Marie Curie Training Network CosmoComp [PITN-GA-2009-238356]
  4. ANR BINGO project [ANR-08-BLAN-0316-01]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-08-BLAN-0316] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a new implementation of radiation hydrodynamics (RHD) in the adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) code ramses. The multigroup radiative transfer (RT) is performed on the AMR grid with a first-order Godunov method using the M1 closure for the Eddington tensor, and is coupled to the hydrodynamics via non-equilibrium thermochemistry of hydrogen and helium. This moment-based approach has the great advantage that the computational cost is independent of the number of radiative sources - it can even deal with continuous regions of emission such as bound-free emission from gas. As it is built directly into ramses, the RT takes natural advantage of the refinement and parallelization strategies already in place. Since we use an explicit advection solver for the radiative transport, the time-step is restricted by the speed of light - a severe limitation that can be alleviated using the so-called reduced speed of light approximation. We propose a rigorous framework to assess the validity of this approximation in various conditions encountered in cosmology and galaxy formation. We finally perform with our newly developed code a complete suite of RHD tests, comparing our results to other RHD codes. The tests demonstrate that our code performs very well and is ideally suited for exploring the effect of radiation on current scenarios of structure and galaxy formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据