4.7 Article

The effective number density of galaxies for weak lensing measurements in the LSST project

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1156

关键词

methods: data analysis; cosmology: observations

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-SC0007901, DE-SC0002607, DE-AC02-76-SFO0515]
  2. National Science Foundation [0809409]
  3. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Future weak lensing surveys potentially hold the highest statistical power for constraining cosmological parameters compared to other cosmological probes. The statistical power of a weak lensing survey is determined by the sky coverage, the inverse of the noise in shear measurements and the galaxy number density. The combination of the latter two factors is often expressed in terms of n(eff) - the 'effective number density of galaxies used for weak lensing measurements'. In this work, we estimate n(eff) for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) project, the most powerful ground-based lensing survey planned for the next two decades. We investigate how the following factors affect the resulting n(eff) of the survey with detailed simulations: (1) survey time, (2) shear measurement algorithm, (3) algorithm for combining multiple exposures, (4) inclusion of data from multiple filter bands, (5) redshift distribution of the galaxies and (6) masking and blending. For the first time, we quantify in a general weak lensing analysis pipeline the sensitivity of n(eff) to the above factors. We find that with current weak lensing algorithms, expected distributions of observing parameters, and all lensing data (r and i band, covering 18 000 degree(2) of sky) for LSST, n(eff) approximate to 37 arcmin(-2) before considering blending and masking, n(eff) approximate to 31 arcmin(-2) when rejecting seriously blended galaxies and n(eff) approximate to 26 arcmin(-2) when considering an additional 15 per cent loss of galaxies due to masking. With future improvements in weak lensing algorithms, these values could be expected to increase by up to 20 per cent. Throughout the paper, we also stress the ways in which n(eff) depends on our ability to understand and control systematic effects in the measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据