4.7 Article

On the formation and physical properties of the intracluster light in hierarchical galaxy formation models

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt2174

关键词

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation

资金

  1. European Research Council under European Community [202781]
  2. PRIN-INAF
  3. PRIN-MIUR
  4. PD51 INFN grant
  5. European Commissions FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Network CosmoComp [PITN-GA-2009-238356]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the formation of the intracluster light (ICL) using a semi-analytic model of galaxy formation, coupled to merger trees extracted from N-body simulations of groups and clusters. We assume that the ICL forms by (1) stellar stripping of satellite galaxies and (2) relaxation processes that take place during galaxy mergers. The fraction of ICL in groups and clusters predicted by our models ranges between 10 and 40 per cent, with a large halo-to-halo scatter and no halo mass dependence. We note, however, that our predicted ICL fractions depend on the resolution: for a set of simulations with particle mass one order of magnitude larger than that adopted in the high-resolution runs used in our study, we find that the predicted ICL fractions are 30-40 per cent larger than those found in the high-resolution runs. On cluster scale, large part of the scatter is due to a range of dynamical histories, while on smaller scale it is driven by individual accretion events and stripping of very massive satellites, M-* greater than or similar to 10(10.5) M-circle dot, that we find to be the major contributors to the ICL. The ICL in our models forms very late (below z similar to 1), and a fraction varying between 5 and 25 per cent of it has been accreted during the hierarchical growth of haloes. In agreement with recent observational measurements, we find the ICL to be made of stars covering a relatively large range of metallicity, with the bulk of them being subsolar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据