4.7 Article

Disc galaxy modelling with a particle-by-particle made-to-measure method

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt021

关键词

Galaxy: structure; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: structure

资金

  1. UK's Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/H00260X/1, ST/J500914/1]
  2. STFC
  3. Large Facilities Capital Fund of BIS
  4. European Union [264895]
  5. STFC [ST/J005673/1, ST/H00260X/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/J500914/1, ST/H008586/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J005673/1, ST/H00260X/1, ST/J500914/1, 1064627, ST/H008586/1, ST/K00333X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have developed the initial version of a new particle-by-particle adaptation of the made-to-measure (M2M) method, aiming to model the Galactic disc from upcoming Galactic stellar survey data. In our new particle-by-particle M2M, the observables of the target system are compared with those of the model galaxy at the position of the target stars (i.e. particles). The weights of the model particles are changed to reproduce the observables of the target system, and the gravitational potential is automatically adjusted by the changing weights of the particles. This paper demonstrates, as the initial work, that the particle-by-particle M2M can recreate a target disc system created by an N-body simulation in a known dark matter potential, with no error in the observables. The radial profiles of the surface density, velocity dispersion in the radial and perpendicular directions, and the rotational velocity of the target disc are all well reproduced from the initial disc model, whose scalelength is different from that of the target disc. We also demonstrate that our M2M can be applied to an incomplete data set and recreate the target disc reasonably well when the observables are restricted to a part of the disc. We discuss our calibration of the model parameters and the importance of regularization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据